Training Splits Explained
A practical guide to training splits — full body, upper/lower, push/pull/legs, body-part and movement-based splits — how training frequency shapes the choice, and why splits apply to sports, not just bodybuilding.

In short
- A training split is simply how you divide your training week — which muscles, movements or qualities you train on which days.
- There is no single best split: the right one depends mostly on how many days a week you can train and recover.
- Full-body and upper/lower splits give each area frequent stimulus on 2–4 days; push/pull/legs and body-part splits suit 4–6 days.
- Splits are not only a bodybuilding idea — a sport week can be split into skill, strength, conditioning and recovery days.
- Pick a split you can repeat consistently; a 'perfect' split you skip half of beats nothing, but loses to a simpler one you actually complete.
On this page
What is a training split?
A training split is simply how you divide your training week: which muscles, movements or physical qualities you train on which days. Instead of trying to train everything, every day, you spread the work across the week in a way that fits your schedule and lets you recover.
There is no single best split. The right one depends mostly on how many days you can realistically train and recover, how experienced you are, and what you are training for. A split that works well for a bodybuilder chasing muscle size may make little sense for a runner, a rower or a racket-sport athlete.
Most splits fall into a few common patterns. Below, each one is described with a short example week so you can see how the days line up in practice.
Full-body split
A full-body split trains most major muscle groups in every session. You typically train 2 to 4 non-consecutive days per week, with rest or light activity in between.
Because each muscle is trained several times per week, full-body sessions often use fewer exercises per muscle group per session. This split is common for beginners, for busy people, and for anyone training only 2 to 3 days.
Mon
Full body
Squat, push, pull, core
Tue
Rest
Wed
Full body
Hinge, push, pull, core
Thu
Rest
Fri
Full body
Lunge, push, pull, core
Sat
Rest
Sun
Rest
Rotating the main lifts between sessions (for example squat one day, deadlift another) helps spread the load and keep sessions manageable.
Upper/lower split
An upper/lower split separates upper-body days from lower-body days. It is a common step up from full-body training and generally suits 4 days per week, though it can be run on 2 or 3 as well.
Each half of the body is usually trained about twice per week, which many people find is enough frequency to make steady progress while still allowing recovery.
Mon
Upper
Push and pull
Tue
Lower
Squat, hinge, calves
Wed
Rest
Thu
Upper
Push and pull
Fri
Lower
Squat, hinge, calves
Sat
Rest
Sun
Rest
Push/pull/legs
Push/pull/legs (often shortened to PPL) groups exercises by their general action:
- Push — chest, shoulders and triceps
- Pull — back and biceps
- Legs — quads, hamstrings, glutes and calves
Run once through, PPL is a 3-day week. Run twice through, it becomes a 6-day week that trains each muscle group roughly twice. It is popular with intermediate and advanced lifters who can train often and recover well.
Mon
Push
Chest, shoulders, triceps
Tue
Pull
Back, biceps
Wed
Legs
Quads, hamstrings, glutes, calves
Thu
Push
Chest, shoulders, triceps
Fri
Pull
Back, biceps
Sat
Legs
Quads, hamstrings, glutes, calves
Sun
Rest
Body-part split
A body-part split (sometimes called a "bro split") dedicates each day to one or two muscle groups. Each muscle is usually trained hard once per week with a higher volume in that single session.
Mon
Chest
Tue
Back
Wed
Shoulders
Thu
Legs
Fri
Arms
Sat
Rest
Sun
Rest
This style is closely associated with bodybuilding. Its main trade-off is frequency: training a muscle only once per week can work, but many find that spreading the same weekly volume across two sessions is at least as effective. It also depends on training 5 or more days per week, which not everyone can sustain.
Movement-based split
A movement-based split organises training around fundamental movement patterns rather than individual muscles. A common set of patterns is:
- Squat — knee-dominant lower body (squats, leg press)
- Hinge — hip-dominant lower body (deadlifts, hip thrusts)
- Push — horizontal and vertical pressing
- Pull — horizontal and vertical rowing and pulling
- Carry / core — loaded carries, bracing and anti-rotation work
Because the patterns overlap muscle groups, they are often combined into sessions rather than each getting its own day.
Mon
Squat + push
Plus a loaded carry
Tue
Rest
Wed
Hinge + pull
Plus anti-rotation core
Thu
Rest
Fri
Squat + push + pull
Lighter, fuller-range work
Sat
Rest
Sun
Rest
This approach appeals to people who care about balanced, transferable strength, and it maps well onto general athletic preparation.
Strength, skill and conditioning split
Splits are not only a bodybuilding idea. Any sport can split its week by quality rather than by muscle group. A racket-sport player, a rower or a runner doing supporting strength work can divide the week into skill/technique, strength, conditioning and recovery.
The goal is to place demanding qualities on separate days so they do not interfere with each other. Hard technique work generally lands when you are fresh; conditioning is often kept away from key skill or strength sessions; and recovery is scheduled deliberately, not left to chance.
Here is one example week for a racket-sport athlete who also lifts:
Mon
Skill
On-court technique and footwork
Tue
Strength
Lower body — squat, hinge
Wed
Conditioning
Intervals and match-play work
Thu
Recovery
Light mobility, easy movement
Fri
Strength
Upper body — push, pull
Sat
Skill
Match play or practice
Sun
Full rest
The same logic applies to a rower or runner: technique and speed work, strength sessions, aerobic conditioning, and recovery each get their own place in the week. The muscle groups matter less than protecting the quality that day is meant to build.
How training frequency affects the split
Frequency means how many times per week you train a given muscle or quality. Frequency and split are closely linked: the split largely determines the frequency, and your target frequency should influence the split you choose.
Generally, the more days you can train, the more you can spread each muscle or quality across the week. Lower frequency tends to favour full-body or upper/lower splits, because those still hit everything often enough within a small number of sessions. Higher frequency opens the door to push/pull/legs or dedicated body-part days.
- Low frequency (2–3 days): full-body or upper/lower usually make the most of each session.
- Moderate frequency (4 days): upper/lower or a four-day PPL-style rotation work well.
- High frequency (5–6 days): push/pull/legs or body-part splits become practical.
For many muscles and qualities, training them about twice per week is a reasonable default. What changes across splits is often how that frequency is packaged, not the total weekly work.
Choosing a split based on available days
The number of days you can consistently train is usually the single biggest factor. The table below maps days per week to splits that tend to fit.
| Days per week | Splits that usually fit |
|---|---|
| 2 | Full-body |
| 3 | Full-body, or push/pull/legs once through |
| 4 | Upper/lower, or a movement-based split |
| 5 | Upper/lower plus an extra day, or body-part |
| 6 | Push/pull/legs (twice through), or body-part |
Treat these as starting points rather than rules. A 3-day full-body week and a 3-day PPL week can both work; the better choice depends on your goals, recovery and preference.
Advantages and disadvantages
Every split trades something off. The table below summarises the common ones.
| Split | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Full-body | High frequency, flexible, forgiving if you miss a day | Sessions can feel long; fatigue can accumulate |
| Upper/lower | Balanced frequency and recovery; scales from 2–4 days | Less time per muscle group in a single session |
| Push/pull/legs | Organised, good for higher frequency | Needs many training days to hit each group twice |
| Body-part | Lots of focused volume per muscle | Low frequency; depends on 5+ days per week |
| Movement-based | Balanced, transferable strength | Less muscle-specific isolation |
| Skill/strength/conditioning | Protects key qualities from interference | Requires careful scheduling and recovery |
No row in this table is "the winner". The right choice depends on your available days, goals and how well you recover.
Common mistakes
A few recurring mistakes undermine otherwise reasonable splits:
- Copying an advanced 6-day bodybuilder split while only training 3 days. The split assumes a frequency you are not hitting, so muscles get trained far less often than intended. Match the split to the days you actually train.
- Chasing the "optimal" split over consistency. The best split is generally the one you will follow week after week. Frequently switching in search of a perfect plan tends to cost more than any small theoretical edge it might gain.
- Neglecting recovery. Rest days, sleep and easier sessions are part of the split, not gaps in it. Stacking hard days without recovery often leads to stalled progress.
- No progression within the split. A split decides when you train each thing, but not whether it gets harder over time. Without a plan to gradually add load, reps or quality, even a well-chosen split stops producing results.
Sources
Related guides
Keep learning with these related guides.